[ BOOKS ] ✭ Aping Mankind Author Raymond Tallis – Marjoriejane.co.uk

Aping Mankind summary Aping Mankind , series Aping Mankind , book Aping Mankind , pdf Aping Mankind , Aping Mankind 1e45453287 Tallis Argues That The Rise Of Biologism Has Serious Consequences And Demonstrates That, By Denying Human Uniqueness And Minimizing The Differences Between Humans And Their Nearest Animal Kin, It Misrepresents What We Are, Offering A Grotesquely Simplified And Degrading Account Of Humanity He Suggests That Seeing Ourselves As Animals May Lead Us To Find Reasons For Treating Others As Less Than Human.


10 thoughts on “Aping Mankind

  1. says:

    Tallis takes on neuroscientists and evolutionary psychologists who, he argues, reduce humans to beasts We have bodily functions like animals but beyond that, we re qualitatively different and exceptional Our distinctive trait is consciousness, which has nothing to do with our biology.Tallis has this theory about the development of consciousness Our upright, bipedal position frees our hands During ou...


  2. says:

    Raymond Tallis plays the Renaissance Man learned in the sciences and humanities come to debunk the twin evils of Neuromania and Darwinitis in Aping Mankind Let me start off by pointing out where I m in agreement with Tallis He didn t need to convince me that there is an epidemic of over inflated claims coming out of a collection of fields that might be termed neuro evolutionary studies I ve increasingly found myself using his coinages, though I would shiftblame for these phenomen Raymond Tallis plays the Renaissance Man learned in the sciences and humanities come to debunk the twin evils of Neuromania and Darwinitis in Aping Mankind Let me start off by pointing out where I m in agreement with Tallis He didn t need to convince me that there is an epidemic of over inflated claims coming out of a collection of fields that might be termed neuro evolutionary studies I ve increasingly found myself using his coinages...


  3. says:

    I actually finished this a week after getting it early last month It s one of those books that I wrote lots of notes alongside and I haven t yet had time to do a collated review but I will do one later as I think it s an important book Just a few points here First, there is an awful lot I disagree with That s fine That s how it should be That s what conversations produce, discussions, arguments But the book itself is well written, well structured, fair and honest it is often rhetorical, I actually finished this a week after getting it early last month It s one of those books that I wrote lots of notes alongside and I haven t yet had time to do a collated review but I will do one later as I think it s an important book Just a few points here First, there is an awful lot I disagree with That s fine That s how it should be That s what conversations produce, discussions, arguments But the book itself is well written, well structured, fair and honest it is often rhetorical, ironic, downright sarcastic and vituperative but it wears it well The Launcelott Spratt bombastic tone is a bit annoying at times but also kind of endearing The main thing is, Tallis has g...


  4. says:

    The classic philosophers debate about mind goes like this do we have nonphysical spirits minds, or does mind have a purely physical basis In favor of a nonphysical mind, one might point out that, even with today s best available technology, scientists are not yet able to correlate a person s every thought with a visual image of their brain activity Since mind is invisible or cannot yet be pointed to as a visual image, and its origins are mysterious, therefore it must be nonphysical On The classic philosophers debate about mind goes like this do we have nonphysical spirits minds, or does mind have a purely physical basis In favor of a nonphysical mind, one might point out that, even with today s best available technology, scientists are not yet able to correlate a person s every thought with a visual image of their brain activity Since mind is invisible or cannot yet be pointed to as a visual image, and its origins are mysterious, therefore it must be nonphysical On the other hand, in favor of a physically grounded mind, one might say that simply because science has not yet unraveled the exceedingly complex and delicate wor...


  5. says:

    I ve enjoyed the Tallis style of fisticuffs ever since I first read his barbed assault on post structuralism in Not Saussure In the last 15 years, I ve bought farof his books than I ve finished, but I did make through this one despite his penchant for logic chopping points into bosons and inventing neologisms like neuromania and Darwinitis If you re the type of skeptic entertained by Frederick Crews ...


  6. says:

    This is a really hard read Tallis is obviously well read and a gifted thinker, but this also makes him a hard read if the topics in science and philosophy are not things you are already familiar with as he is a name dropper and many of the names may mean nothing to you His writing style is also difficult at times as you have to carefully follow whether he is arguing a point of science or logic But overall his critique of both where certain neo atheists are taking Darwin s theory and the claim This is a really hard read Tallis is obviously well read and a gifted thinker, but this also makes him a hard read if the topics in science and philosophy are not things you are already familiar with as he is a name dropper and many of the names may mean nothing to you His writing style is also difficult at times as you have to carefully follow whether he is arguing a point of science or logic But overall his critique of both where certain neo atheists are taking Darwin s theory and the claims being made by atheistic materialists regarding neuro science are very profound Tallis doesn t believe their claims are justified by current science and they in...


  7. says:

    Very, very few books can claim to have changed my mind about something fundamental This one did Not an easy read, tightly argued, occasionally polemical and ultimately convincing me that my prior views were probably mistaken.


  8. says:

    I agree with so much of this book, particularly the attack on crude Darwinian approaches However, at the end of the day, I think he buys too much into the Two Cultures view I think there are ways of opposing the reductive trends in current neuro science without committing ourselves to the idea that human beings are not animals Yes, we are a very special animal Despite his repeated disavowals the framework is basically Cartesian there is Nature and there is us building cathedrals and wri I agree with so much of this book, particularly the attack on crude Darwinian approaches However, at the end of the day, I think he buys too much into the Two Cultures view I think there are ways of opposing the reductive trends in current neuro science without committing ourselves to the idea that human beings are not animals Yes, we are a very special animal Despite his repeated disavowals the framework is basically...


  9. says:

    Tallis has written one very good book and one mediocre book, and they are both between the same two covers The first half of Aping Mankind is a sweeping, scathing and often hysterical demolition of the notion that the full panorama of human cognition can be reduced to neural activity Tallis s brilliance here is not simply in showing that neuroscience hasn t explained consciousness through brain activities His most compelling achievement is in showing that neuroscience can t explain consciou Tallis has written one very good book and one mediocre book, and they are both between the same two covers The first half of Aping Mankind is a sweeping, scathing and often hysterical ...


  10. says:

    A brilliant rebuttal to those scientific endeavors that wish to explain consciousness away as nothingthan a biological byproduct, a challenge not from the straw man religious fanatic they tend to prop up, but from a self proclaimed atheist humanist who happens to also be a clinical neuroscientist To me Intelligent Design is a misdirect, the real danger to the future integrity of human knowledge, to the progress of modern civilization, is this ill conceived scientism that goes largely unno A brilliant rebuttal to th...


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *